<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>PilotQuest</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2008-06-07:/b//1</id>
    <updated>2010-09-21T10:00:22Z</updated>
    <subtitle>PilotQuest.com: helping you pursue your dream of flight</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Melody 1.0.0 (RC 2, build 36)</generator>

<entry>
    <title>My summary of the Sept 20 SJC Airport Commission meeting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/09/my-summary-of-the-sept-20-sjc.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.19</id>

    <published>2010-09-21T05:16:26Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-21T10:00:22Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[This is my unofficial summary of the Sept 20, 2010 meeting of the San Jose Int'l Airport Commission.&nbsp; It's just my view as one of the participants, intended to help others interested in the process to follow it.&nbsp; The airport...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="airport commission" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[This is my unofficial summary of the Sept 20, 2010 meeting of the San Jose Int'l Airport Commission.&nbsp; It's just my view as one of the participants, intended to help others interested in the process to follow it.&nbsp; The airport staff will post the official minutes at the <a href="http://flysanjose.com/about.php?page=commission/meetings&amp;exp=2&amp;subtitle=Airport+Commission+%7C+Meetings+/+Minutes">Airport Commission page on FlySanJose.Com</a>.&nbsp; This is my point of view of the meeting.<br /><br />This was my first meeting seated as a commissioner.&nbsp; It's been a while since my term officially started in July.&nbsp; But there's no July meeting due to California's "legislative break" which includes local government.&nbsp; And the August meeting was canceled.&nbsp; So it took longer than normal to get the first meeting.<br /><br />I was expecting that one issue would be contentious and one would be time-consuming.&nbsp; The time-consuming item (or group of similar items) were the orientation presentations for the three new commissioners, including me.<br /><br />The item I expected to be contentious was the report on the city's request for proposals (RFP) on development of new private hangars on the southwest corner.&nbsp; There are currently General Aviation tie-down parking and hangars, and the former SJSU Aviation Dept facility.&nbsp; The RFP was prompted by&nbsp; the expiration of SJSU's lease.&nbsp; The facility is currently being demolished.&nbsp; But the tie-downs and hangars are currently in use, the last group of light aircraft based at SJC.&nbsp; To them, it had the appearance that they were imminently being run out of the airport.&nbsp; So now you can also understand why that was expected to be contentious.<br /><br />So here's what happened...<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[As I said in <a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2010/09/my-preview-of-the-sept-20-sjc.html">my preview of the meeting</a>, I wasn't posting my opinions until after the meeting.&nbsp; It avoids potential inadvertent violations of the Brown Act. (More below on that.)&nbsp; Now that the meeting has been held, this is all public information.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Top issue: Private Hangar RFP</b></font><br /><br />The meeting began on time at 6PM.&nbsp; Airport Commission Chairman Frank Sweeney brought the Private Hangar RFP to the top of the agenda right after the consent calendar.&nbsp; The consent calendar (list of routine items) was accepted without pulling any items for discussion.<br /><br />Then the RFP discussion was next.&nbsp; It turned out the airport staff accepted the input from the General Aviation aircraft tenants at the <a href="http://flysanjose.com/business/BIDS/Westside_RFP.pdf">July 21 public meeting</a> (PDF).&nbsp; There was no contention after all.&nbsp; The <a href="http://flysanjose.com/business/BIDS/Private_Hangar_QA.pdf">city's responses</a> (PDF) to the questions from the public meeting showed how many troublesome issues were brought up about the plan.&nbsp; The economic factors didn't add up to a workable business.&nbsp; There was little space to build large hangars due to the proximity to Runway 11/29.&nbsp; There were underground utilities that further complicated any construction in the relatively small area.&nbsp; And of course, the people whose airplanes are tied down or hangared in that area don't want to be run out of a public airport.&nbsp; And there were even more problems.<br /><br />The staff acknowledged the public input told them the original plan wasn't going to work.&nbsp; Now with a better understanding of the challenge before them, there's no need to hurry on developing that site.&nbsp; So it will be considered as part of a larger plan for a new Fixed Base Operator (FBO) on the West Side of the airport after Long Term Parking moves to the East Side (the former rental car lot, before rental cars moved to the new Terminal B garage.)&nbsp; So demolition of the hangars is no longer imminent or planned.<br /><br />Doug Rice of the California Pilots Association later made a comment describing the decision as "a breath of fresh air".<br /><br />With that, there was nothing for the commission to vote on that issue.&nbsp; I'm relieved to see the public input process worked as intended in this case.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>New Commissioner Orientation</b><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><b>:<font style="font-size: 1.25em;"> Airport Organizational Structure</font></b></font></font><br /><br />Assistant Director of Aviation (Assistant Airport Director) Kim Aguirre described the airport organization and introduced staff who were present in the room.&nbsp; The org charts on the slides had bunches of boxes in red showing positions that were eliminated in recent layoffs.&nbsp; The down economy has taken its toll, cutting staff from 400 two years ago to just over 200 now.<br /><br />The only way out of the economic problem for the airport is more flights.&nbsp; Airport Director Bill Sherry and Air Service Development Manager Ed Nelson missed this commission meeting because they are in Vancouver at the "Routes" conference where airlines and airports get together to talk business. <br /><br />The focus for the next year is to reverse the decline in airline passenger numbers.&nbsp; The "cost per enplanement" (CPE) dictates what the airport can charge the airlines, and therefore most of the airport's budget.&nbsp; Cost is the part of the fraction they can control.&nbsp; When enplanements plummeted in recent years, the cost cutting became necessary.&nbsp; But if enplanements can be brought up again, that will be the path to turning the situation around.<br /><br />It appears feasible that the airport is in a position to do that.&nbsp; The construction of Terminal B is done.&nbsp; Now the airport looks great no matter which airline a passenger is flying.&nbsp; Previously passengers in Terminal C saw jet boarding via air stairs, since the terminal pre-dated jet bridges.&nbsp; But now airlines have moved to the renovated A or brand new B. Terminal C is being demolished and will be gone in another 2 weeks.<br /><br />But until things do recover, for now the theme is "no new initiatives".&nbsp; Staff is at 50% of recent levels. The organization isn't completely settled in to the new offices at Terminal B.&nbsp; The administrative staff is still moving out of the North First office building to Terminal B.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>New Commissioner Orientation</b><font><b>: Commission Roles and Responsibilities</b><font style="font-size: 0.8em;"><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">The Airport Commission is defined in the <a href="http://sanjose.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/sanjose_ca/title2administration*/chapter208boardsbureausandcommissions15?f=templates$fn=document-frame.htm$3.0#JD_2.08.400">San Jose Municipal code Section 2.08.400</a>. Basically it "investigate, study or review" any subject about the airport or aviation assigned to it by the city council, airport staff (via the Director of Aviation), a member of the public or from the commission's own initiative.&nbsp; The results of these reviews are reported to the city council and airport staff (again, via the Director of Aviation.)<br /><br />The commission may sometimes also hear appeals of permit suspensions or revocations from airport concessions and tenants.&nbsp; I've seen where one of those can fill the room with an SRO crowd, at a meeting I attended as a citizen before I was a commissioner.&nbsp; It'll undoubtedly happen again</font>.<br /><br /><b>New Commissioner Orientation: Brown Act</b><br /><br /><font style="font-size: 0.8em;">Deputy City Attorney Kevin Fisher presented California's open meeting law, the "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Act">Brown Act</a>". The intent is to provide public access to decision-making in "local legislatures".&nbsp; That includes city councils and also boards and commissions established by them.&nbsp; So the Airport Commission is subject to the Brown Act.<br /><br />One of the tricky things about the Brown Act is that it defines any gathering of a majority of the legislative members at the same place and time for discussion or to receive information, as a meeting.&nbsp; That's only allowed to happen if the public is invited too - with agendas posted 72 hours in advance, or 24 hours for special meetings.&nbsp; Though San Jose's sunshine ordinance extends those to 7 days for regular meetings and 4 days for special meetings.&nbsp; There are exceptions for public events where a majority of the members happen to attend, and are not discussing business.&nbsp; And people have tried to circumvent this before - so any kind of passing messages can become a "serial conversation" if it expands to include a majority of the members.&nbsp; (The possibility of an inadvertent serial conversation is why I don't post my opinions on the pre-meeting summary.)<br /></font></font><br />So it limits how much we can talk to each other.&nbsp; Though it never restricts people from just talking one-on-one.<br /><br />The Airport Commission meetings are always open to the public.&nbsp; The Brown Act allows closed sessions for cases of litigation, real estate negotiations, threats to public safety or personnel/labor issues.&nbsp; In all those cases, the city council handles those.&nbsp; So the Airport Commission never meets in closed session.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Airport Commission by-laws amendment</b></font><br /><br />Due to budget cuts, the city has ordered all boards and commissions to change from monthly to quarterly meetings.&nbsp; It cuts costs of staff who attend the meetings to record them. Since the Airport Commission's by-laws document said we meet monthly, it needed to be updated.&nbsp; Deputy City Attorney Kevin Fisher made the minimal necessary changes.&nbsp; Then the commission gave the whole thing a review.&nbsp; Several of us added some minor changes, mainly cleanups.<br /><br />I pointed out that these by-laws are not available on the city or airport web sites, except as an attachment to this meeting's agenda.&nbsp; The staff accepted my suggestion that it should be posted on the airport web site in the Airport Commission info area.&nbsp; After all, it's the document that says how the Airport Commission does its work.&nbsp; I should point out that this was in compliance with the city regulations, which only require board and commission by-laws to be available at the city clerk's office.&nbsp; But as soon as I mentioned it wasn't on the web site, there was an understanding across the room that today the web is the best practice in openness. So that suggestion went over well.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>New Commissioner Orientation: Marketing and Communications Division Roles and Responsibilities</b></font><br /><br />Airport Communications Director David Vossbrink presented his department to the commission. In a similar theme to what we'd been hearing, his staff has been reduced from 15 to 6 over the past 2 years.&nbsp; His group handles the outward-facing roles of the airport.<br /><br />Air service development works to retain and attract airlines and routes. Customer services had been focused on construction issues.&nbsp; Now the customer experience is the focus. The gov't and legislative affairs role works as part of the City of San Jose for city council issues, and outwardly with the state and federal governments. The communications role handles news media, the web site, social media and publications. The community relations focuses on being a good neighbor, and acts as an ombudsman to help neighbors resolve their issues.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Air Service Development Update</b></font><br /><br />David Vossbrink continued with slides on air service development by Air Service Development Manager Ed Nelson, who couldn't attend because he's at the Routes conference in Vancouver meeting with airlines.<br /><br />Ed's role is to retain and attract flights and carriers at SJC.&nbsp; With the renovation of Terminal A and the completion of Terminal B in June, we now have a great airport.&nbsp; That big step is done.&nbsp; Another important step is to keep costs competitive.&nbsp; And marketing for more flights is a never-ending task.<br /><br />SJC's marketing is primarily to the airlines.&nbsp; Currently the flights are running overall 80% full.&nbsp; Some carriers are higher than others.&nbsp; So the only way to increase the overall passenger volume for the airport is to get more flights.<br /><br />SJC's competition is not just Bay Area airports but across the country.&nbsp; Just about everyone wants more flights.&nbsp; The recession has affected everyone.<br /><br />The question was asked about the passenger air fare differences between San Jose and San Francisco.&nbsp; SFO has a higher CPE than SJC, and passes that along to the airlines.&nbsp; With what we can control, we don't charge the airlines as much as SFO does.&nbsp; The fares passengers pay at SFO is just a function of competition.&nbsp; The airlines can't charge as much as they'd like/need to at SFO. Our only way to deal with that is to get more flights.&nbsp; And since we've kept our CPE lower than SFO, price doesn't seem to be the obstacle.<br /><br />We've had recent good news.&nbsp; Alaska and Horizon&nbsp; have been adding routes at San Jose, including Austin, Kahului, Kona, </font></font></font>Lihue and Cabo San Lucas.&nbsp; Southwest added Austin, which will compete with Alaska.&nbsp; JetBlue added Boston.&nbsp; And Mexican low-cost carrier Volaris added Guadalajara.<br /><br />We've also had some bad news.&nbsp; Mexicana collapsed and went out of business. However the route between San Jose and Guadalajara is now handled by Volaris. Traffic is still trending down, partly due to route cuts by American.<br /><br />The airport has incentive programs to initially waive some amounts of landing fees for new airlines and routes.&nbsp; Mayor Reed considers increasing air service at SJC a top priority.&nbsp; Bill Sherry and Ed Nelson are at the Routes conference in Vancouver, having appointments with a dozen international carriers.<br /><br />There have been recent visits by ANA (Japan) and EVA Air (Taiwan) considering SJC as a possible destination.&nbsp; Both those routes have previously been flown non-stop from San Jose by American when SJC was their West Coast hub.&nbsp; So we're hopeful about those.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Competitive Strategic Plan Update</b></font><br /><br />This was a quick update by Kim Aguirre on the study that was conducted with the airport staff and the city council rules committee.&nbsp; Most of the material that was discussed with them duplicates what was already presented to the commission in this meeting.&nbsp; For example, to get more passengers, we need more flights.&nbsp; The list of issues about cost per enplanement (CPE) at SJC vs other nearby airports was a focus.<br /><br /><font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>Can of worms opened: Work Plan Update</b></font><br /><br />This was the surprise big issue of the meeting.<br /><br />The city council has made a rule which came from the City Clerk's office that all boards and commissions must annually make a "work plan" to decide what we'll be doing in upcoming meetings.&nbsp; The work plan can be updated as necessary at any meeting.&nbsp; However... we no longer have our own rules committee to update our agendas.&nbsp; Agendas are made from the work plan. And changes to the work plans of all the boards and commissions have to be approved each time by the rules committee of the city council.&nbsp; Our realization of the implications of this new rule snowballed as the discussion went on.<br /><br />The work plan items for September are complete.&nbsp; Yeah, duh.&nbsp; That's this meeting.<br /><br />I added an item to the work plan for the December meeting.&nbsp; There was an incident in Santa Barbara where the <a href="http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2010/100830kings.html">owners of King Flight Schools were mistakenly detained</a> with many guns drawn by Santa Barbara Police, over an error in an FAA database.&nbsp; (See the <a href="http://johnandmartha.kingschools.com/2010/08/31/our-gunpoint-at-the-airport-ordeal/">Kings' blog</a>.&nbsp; AOPA reports the <a href="http://www.aopa.org/aircraft/articles/2010/100831kings.html">FAA fixed their database</a>.) It has brought up a lot of questions about police training for dealing with aircraft. We should learn what we can from it and apply it here.&nbsp; Kim said we can probably bring in the SJPD officer who represents the airport police station for the December meeting.&nbsp; <i>I'll have to make a separate blog entry out of this item.</i><br /><br />Commissioner John Salah also added to the work plan to review airport concession and customer service issues quarterly.<br /><br />Doug Rice of the California Pilots Association and a former SJC airport commissioner pointed out the big problem with the work plans for people who don't have a seat at the table.&nbsp; It seems to add 3 months of delays (due to lag time now that we have quarterly meetings) between a member of the public submitting an issue and getting it on the agenda.&nbsp; The staff and even the city attorney were not sure if the 7 day rule allows members of the public to add agenda items directly or get them onto the work plan for the following quarterly meeting.<br /><br />These separate budget cutting issues have clearly led to unintended consequences.&nbsp; The city clerk's office was obviously trying to optimize staff time, without realizing how it would add months of delays to public input.&nbsp; Airport staff and possibly commissioners acting as individuals will bring it to city hall.&nbsp; This needs to be fixed.<br /><br />That was the last item.&nbsp; The meeting adjourned at 8:36pm.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My preview of the Sept 20 SJC Airport Commission meeting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/09/my-preview-of-the-sept-20-sjc.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.18</id>

    <published>2010-09-20T12:11:37Z</published>
    <updated>2010-09-20T14:46:54Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I'll post a summary of what to expect from the San Jose International Airport Commission meeting tonight (Sept 20, 2010).&nbsp; It will be at 6PM at 1732 North First Street, Suite 600 (6th floor) in San Jose.First I'd like to...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="airport commission" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[I'll post a summary of what to expect from the San Jose International Airport Commission meeting tonight (Sept 20, 2010).&nbsp; It will be at 6PM at <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;source=s_q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=37.367971,-121.913691&amp;sll=37.367996,-121.913642&amp;sspn=0.002132,0.004243&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;t=h&amp;z=16">1732 North First Street</a>, Suite 600 (6th floor) in San Jose.<br /><br />First I'd like to credit my friend and former co-worker Jim Griffith for giving me the idea.&nbsp; I watched the process as he ran for and was elected to the Sunnyvale City Council.&nbsp; On his blog at <a href="http://dweeb.org/">dweeb.org</a> he posts previews before city council meetings, and summaries afterward.&nbsp; These are a separate unofficial point of view of one of the participants, separate from the official agenda and minutes.&nbsp; The extra narrative is intended to help anyone who is interested to follow what's going on.<br /><br />On previews before the meeting (like this post) I'll only describe what's on the agenda.&nbsp; Even though my position on the Airport Commission is an appointed volunteer advisory role, it is still subject to the same requirements of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Act">California's "Brown Act" open local government law</a> as elected officials.&nbsp; So I'll save my opinions for the commission meeting itself and my post-meeting unofficial summary, after items have been voted on, and my discussion of them is no longer restricted.&nbsp; The intent of the law is to make all the official discussion happen at the published meeting time when members of the public are able to attend.&nbsp; All San Jose Airport Commission meetings are open to the public.<br /><br />So, here's what's coming up at the SJC Airport Commission meeting...<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[This is probably going to be a long meeting.&nbsp; You can see <a href="http://flysanjose.com/about.php?page=commission/meetings&amp;exp=2&amp;subtitle=Airport+Commission+%7C+Meetings+/+Minutes">the agenda</a> (PDF) for yourself on the airport's web site.<br /><br />There are no ceremonial items on this meeting's agenda.&nbsp; If there had been, they would be held first.<br /><br />The "Consent Calendar" is a term for routine items on the agenda which can be approved with a single motion.&nbsp; (That's the California government term for it.&nbsp; In other contexts the same thing may be called a "consent agenda".)&nbsp; It's intended to save time, avoiding drudging through routine stuff.&nbsp; Although any commissioner can pull items out of the consent calendar for discussion before the remaining items are approved as a group.<br /><br />This meeting's consent calendar items are approval of the minutes from the previous commission meeting on June 14, noise complaint and curfew summaries for May and June, the list of upcoming commission meetings, and the <a href="http://flysanjose.com/about/commission/agendas/Sept10_d5.pdf">Terminal Area Improvement Program (TAIP) quarterly report</a> (PDF) update.&nbsp; The TAIP report is the final one, covering completion of Terminal B and renovation of Terminal A.<br /><br />The meeting's general business will include two agenda items with presentations which are an orientation for the three new commissioners (who are Spencer Horowitz, George Gange and myself).&nbsp; This may also be of interest to anyone considering applying for the Airport Commission in the future, to find out what you'd be getting yourself into.&nbsp; Attendees should expect these may be lengthy presentations - there's a lot to talk about.<br /><br />The commission will also <a href="http://flysanjose.com/about/commission/agendas/Sept10_e2.pdf">amend its by-laws</a> (PDF).&nbsp; The city's budget cuts have included reducing all the boards and commissions from monthly to quarterly meetings (which reduces overtime for paid staff who attend the meetings.)&nbsp; The by-laws currently say the commission meets monthly, and need to be amended to comply with the quarterly schedule.&nbsp; Special meetings may still be held on additional months as needed.<br /><br />There will be an item on the airport's Request for Proposals (RFP) about development of the southwest corner of the airport where there are currently General Aviation hangars and the former San Jose State University site.&nbsp; (SJSU's site is being demolished following expiration of the lease.&nbsp; SJSU scaled down its operation and moved it to Reid-Hillview Airport in East San Jose.)&nbsp; There is online information about the RFP on the airport web site: the <a href="http://flysanjose.com/business/BIDS/Westside_RFP.pdf">presentation slides</a> (PDF) from a public meeting on July 21, and <a href="http://flysanjose.com/business/BIDS/Private_Hangar_QA.pdf">answers to questions</a> (PDF) from that meeting.<br /><br />The last item of general business will be the <a href="http://flysanjose.com/about/commission/agendas/Sept10_e5.pdf">Airport Commission's work plan</a> (PDF).&nbsp; It's a summary of the items expected to be on the upcoming meeting agendas for the next year.<br /><br />Due to the change to a quarterly schedule, the next regularly scheduled Airport Commission meeting after this will be December 13.&nbsp; By then the airport administrative offices and the Airport Commission meetings are expected to have moved from the North First Street office building to the airport.&nbsp; It's because the office and conference room facilities now exist in the new Terminal B, and an airport cost reduction to exit the lease on the North First office building.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Can you recognize a thunderstorm without seeing lightning?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/08/can-you-recognize-a-thundersto.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.17</id>

    <published>2010-08-23T02:58:51Z</published>
    <updated>2010-08-23T21:27:31Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[As much as people like to talk about it, it seems most really don't care much about the weather.&nbsp; At least not enough to learn about it.&nbsp; Every Spring and Autumn in Northern California, we tend to get some occasional...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="safety" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="weather" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="safety" label="safety" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thunderstorms" label="thunderstorms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="weather" label="weather" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[As much as people like to talk about it, it seems most really don't care much about the weather.&nbsp; At least not enough to learn about it.&nbsp; Every Spring and Autumn in Northern California, we tend to get some occasional thunderstorms. Without fail, someone always tells me, "we never get thunderstorms here."&nbsp; When they say that, it tells me they can only recognize a thunderstorm when they see lightning.&nbsp; And they don't watch the sky very often.<br /><br />Most city-dwellers can get away with not knowing or caring about the weather like that.&nbsp; If you're a pilot, you probably (hopefully!) know how to recognize a thunderstorm.&nbsp; If you want to be a pilot, you'll have to learn.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[We're coming up to the time of year that hurricane season off the Pacific coast
of Mexico will start churning some tropical clouds up our way once in a
while. Every year is different.&nbsp; But we can count on having at least some thunderstorm activity.&nbsp; There are occasional worst cases when clouds which were the remnants of a hurricane cross over California, which can give us a day or more of widespread and energetic thunderstorms.<br /><br /><u><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">What causes thunderstorms to form?</font></b></u><br /><br />There are three ingredients to a thunderstorm: sufficient moisture, unstable air and uplift.&nbsp; If all three of these are present, <i>a thunderstorm will form</i>.&nbsp; Thunderstorms can occur anywhere in the world, though with widely varying probability.<br /><br />For example, in tropical regions, they happen just about every afternoon. &nbsp; Florida acts like it's tropical most of the year even though it's higher latitude than the tropics, because of the influence of the warm water of the Gulf of Mexico.<br /><br />Here in California with our diverse topography, it depends where you are.&nbsp; Any of our many mountain ranges, especially the Sierra Nevada, can provide the uplift ingredient for thunderstorm formation.&nbsp; All you need is a day with moisture and unstable air.&nbsp; So it can and does get in the way of mountain flying. <br /><br /><u><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">What does a thunderstorm cloud look like?</font></b></u><br /><br />In California, usually pilots are among the few who can answer this question.&nbsp; Make sure that's true for you.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_2394-med-29.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_2394-med-29.html','popup','width=500,height=333,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_2394-med-thumb-350x233-29.jpg" alt="img_2394-med.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="233" width="350" /></a></span>Thunderstorms always form from cumulus clouds.&nbsp; You can recognize cumulus clouds for their cotton-like puffy shape.<br /><br />If the clouds tops are jagged, not curved, then the cloud is not growing and not currently a danger of becoming a thunderstorm.&nbsp; However, they can change to growing.&nbsp; So you still have to keep an eye on them when you're flying or planning to fly.<br /><br />Cumulus clouds evoke opposite reactions from glider and powered plane pilots.&nbsp; Glider pilots see cumulus and think "lift".&nbsp; Powered plane pilots see them and think "turbulence".&nbsp; But both agree thunderstorms mean trouble. <br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_0953-med-32.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_0953-med-32.html','popup','width=500,height=333,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_0953-med-thumb-350x233-32.jpg" alt="img_0953-med.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="233" width="350" /></a></span>When cumulus clouds have curved tops, they're growing.&nbsp; If there's enough moisture to sustain them, they'll turn into a "towering cumulus" or a "thunderhead" on the way to becoming a full-fledged thunderstorm.&nbsp; Once there are wispy icy cirrus clouds in the top of the storm, it's a thunderstorm.&nbsp; It will spread out and flatten at the top, giving it an "anvil" shape which makes most thunderstorms easy to recognize.&nbsp; About the same time, it will begin to rain under the cloud.&nbsp; You don't have to be under it to know that.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_5035-med-37.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_5035-med-37.html','popup','width=500,height=333,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/08/img_5035-med-thumb-350x233-37.jpg" alt="img_5035-med.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="233" width="350" /></a></span>Once it starts precipitating, the cumulus cloud becomes cumulonimbus.&nbsp; The nimbus suffix simply means a rain cloud.<br /><br />On a dry day here in the west, precipitation from a thunderstorm doesn't always reach the ground.&nbsp; If it evaporates before falling to the ground, we call it <i>virga</i>.<br /><br /><u><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">When does California get thunderstorms?</font></b></u><br /><br />Not on one of our trademark "California severe clear" visibility-unlimited days.<br /><br />But any day with some moisture in the air, for example when you see clouds around the mountains, there's something to watch.&nbsp; If there's instability in the air, the bigger mountains will be the first to start growth of thunderstorms.<br /><br />Thunderstorms can occur ahead of and embedded in fronts.&nbsp; Immediately following a front, glider pilots often enjoy flying in the lift provided by unstable "post frontal" weather.&nbsp; That instability can also cause isolated thunderstorms.<br /><br />On warm days, thermals from the sun-heated ground can start growth of cumulus clouds. We don't often have the mix of "muggy" warm and moist air in Northern California.&nbsp; When we do, it's more common in August to October during the Eastern Pacific hurricane season.&nbsp; The <a href="http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/index.shtml?epac">National Hurricane Center's Eastern Pacific page</a> tells whether there's any activity which could later affect us on the West Coast.&nbsp; Storms usually head to the west and angle slightly more to northern latitudes until they get swept into the low point of a wave in the jet stream.&nbsp; Those waves in the jet stream correspond to the storms and troughs we have at our latitudes.<br /><br />If a trough at our latitude lines up to catch some or all of the remnants of a hurricane or tropical storm and bring it through California, that's what it takes to make significant and widespread thunderstorms here.&nbsp; If you watch the weather, you can almost always see them coming before they happen.&nbsp; (Then you can quietly snicker at the people who tell you that it "never" happens here. You know better.)<br /><br />I have an example which was literally close to home... see the <a href="http://ian.kluft.com/pics/ltngstrike/">photos of burn marks on a tree in my backyard</a>, which was struck by lightning just after 6AM on Sept 9, 1999.&nbsp; It was during a thunderstorm that occurred in San Jose when the remnants of Hurricane Greg, which had broken up off the coast of Mexico, passed over Northern California.&nbsp; My yard wasn't alone - over a thousand lightning strikes were recorded in the Bay Area on the night of the 8th and morning of the 9th as the line of very energetic storms crossed the region.&nbsp; <br /><br />Those conditions were exceptional.&nbsp; But they do happen once every few years.<br /><br /><u><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">What should you do about thunderstorms?</font></b></u><br /><br />The winds inside a thunderstorm are so violent, they have literally ripped airplanes apart.&nbsp; Few people live to tell about it.&nbsp; So stay out of them.<br /><br />When you're going flying, the first resource is your weather briefing.&nbsp; If it mentions convective activity, take it seriously.&nbsp; That generally means thunderstorms.&nbsp; And if you're flying over mountains, thunderstorms will be more prevalent, probably meaning fewer gaps, than over the valleys.&nbsp;&nbsp; They tend to increase in the afternoon, which may affect your return flight home.&nbsp; Plan for it.<br /><br />The influence of a thunderstorm extends outside the clouds.&nbsp; Gusty winds and downdrafts can be expected around them.&nbsp; Hail can fall under the icy anvil cloud.&nbsp; The FAA and AOPA Air Safety Foundation (ASF) both recommend that light aircraft should stay 10 miles from any thunderstorm, and 20 miles from a severe thunderstorm.&nbsp; What are signs of a severe thunderstorm?&nbsp; If you can see frequent lightning or if the cloud is very large laterally, it's probably better to treat it as if it's severe, just in case.&nbsp; If you see a funnel or a tornado, definitely treat it as severe.<br /><br />So that means if you're looking at the cloud from the air, you'll have to go around it.&nbsp; If you can't go around it, divert to an airport far enough away from any storms that you'll have time to secure the aircraft before a storm arrives.&nbsp; Remember that safe airports may be behind you.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2008/06/rhv-funnel-20080621-5.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2008/06/rhv-funnel-20080621-5.html','popup','width=440,height=600,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2008/06/rhv-funnel-20080621-thumb-350x477-5.jpg" alt="rhv-funnel-20080621.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="477" width="350" /></a></span>If you're at the airport and you see a thunderstorm within 10 miles, just keep the aircraft secured until the storm passes.&nbsp; For example, one day I was among many pilots choosing to stay on the ground at Reid-Hillview Airport in San Jose while watching a bunch of nearby thunderstorms.&nbsp; Before the storms arrived, it had been hot and muggy - so the ingredients for thunderstorms were apparent.&nbsp; But some people were flying around in the pattern even as the thunderstorm clouds were overhead and squirrelly winds were blowing.&nbsp; Confirming my thought that it wasn't a good time to be flying, I photographed a funnel cloud from one of the thunderstorms southwest of the airport.&nbsp; That storm was getting better organized than it appeared.<br /><br />For VFR pilots, the advice is clear - make sure to stay out of the clouds.&nbsp; For IFR pilots, it's trickier because you're able to fly in the weather.&nbsp; And it can hide thunderstorms. The AOPA ASF's Safety Advisor #26 publication is called <a href="http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/sa26.pdf">Thunderstorms and ATC</a>.&nbsp; It has info how you can use ATC as a resource.&nbsp; ASF has more resources about thunderstorms at <a href="http://www.asf.org/thunderstorms">www.asf.org/thunderstorms</a> including a quick reference card and an online training course which is good for FAA Wings recurrent training credit and incentives with some insurance carriers.<br /><br />Useful but more general information about thunderstorms can be found at the <a href="http://www.srh.weather.gov/jetstream/tstorms/tstorms_intro.htm">Thunderstorms section of the National Weather Service's "JetStream online weather school" site</a>.<br /><br />As pilot in command, it's your responsibility to be aware of the location of thunderstorms and stay out of them.&nbsp; Sometimes it may be a good idea to land to figure out the weather situation from the ground. There's a saying... <i>It's better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air, than in the air wishing you were on the ground.</i>&nbsp; Use that as a factor in making sure you exercise good judgment.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My appointment to the San Jose Int&apos;l Airport Commission</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/06/my-appointment-to-the-san-jose.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.16</id>

    <published>2010-06-15T18:12:16Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-15T21:55:48Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[At the June 8 meeting of the San Jose City Council, my appointment to the SJ Int'l Airport Commission was among about 3 dozen appointments the council made to various city boards and commissions.&nbsp; Since then, some friends have asked...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="airport commission" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[At the June 8 meeting of the San Jose City Council, my appointment to the SJ Int'l Airport Commission was among about 3 dozen appointments the council made to various city boards and commissions.&nbsp; Since then, some friends have asked a fair question, "What does this mean for you?"<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<font style="font-size: 1.25em;"><b>It's a volunteer position</b></font><br /><br />In San Jose, all the city boards and commissions are volunteer, unpaid positions. Yet it's also a position of public trust, under <a href="http://www.sanjoseca.gov/clerk/CouncilDocs/BrownAct_CA.pdf">California's Brown Act</a> about open public meetings. It means I'm getting more involved in my community in a topic that
means a lot to me.<br /><br />The San Jose Int'l Airport Commission is considered the panel of experts who advises the city council and airport staff on planning and operation of the airport.&nbsp; Since SJC is a part of the city government, not a separate district or entity, the city council is the final decision-making body.&nbsp; The Airport Commission can make advice, and even put items on the city council agenda.&nbsp; They are free to ignore the Airport Commission if they want.&nbsp; That means our advice needs to make sense and be convincing.<br /><br />When there has been news about the airport over the past decade, including progress on construction, I have often referred to the <a href="http://www.sjc.org/about.php?page=commission/meetings&amp;exp=2&amp;subtitle=Airport+Commission+%7C+Meetings+/+Minutes">Airport Commission's agendas and minutes</a> on the sjc.org web site to get more details than the media reports.&nbsp; It's all public information.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/06/img_2369sc-26.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/06/img_2369sc-26.html','popup','width=800,height=467,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/06/img_2369sc-thumb-350x204-26.jpg" alt="SJCAC-20100614.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="204" width="350" /></a></span><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">6/14 meeting: Thanks to outgoing commissioners, congrats to incoming</font></b><br /><br />My term doesn't begin until July 1, 2010.&nbsp; I attended the June 14 meeting as a citizen.&nbsp; I had also attended the April and May meetings - but didn't yet know at the time that my application to the commission was going to be accepted.&nbsp; This time, along with the other two new appointees Spencer Horowitz and George Gange who were also present at the meeting, we were congratulated on our appointments to the commission. Thank you very much everyone!<br /><br />At the end of the meeting, there was a ceremonial item to thank Commissioner Sukhdev Bainiwal for the completion of 6 years (two terms) on the commission.&nbsp; Two terms is the limit, when other citizens get a turn.&nbsp; His fellow commissioners familiar with his work had many kind words.&nbsp; I also make it a point to thank volunteers for their efforts, and said so to him.&nbsp; He and the others were kind and enthusiastic in their congratulations to us new appointees to the commission. <br />
<br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Issues facing the airport</font><br /></b><br />For the convenience of having a downtown airport, we have recurring issues to deal with including jet noise near homes and limits on building heights in downtown San Jose.&nbsp; These are not new. We just have to keep dealing with them.&nbsp; With that acknowledged up-front, I'll summarize some current issues.<br /><br />The economy has hit the airport like everything else.&nbsp; At the June 14 Airport Commission meeting the presentation of the airport budget showed a lot of difficult cuts which had to be made to maintain a contractual level of "cost per enplanement" (CPE) which the airport had committed to the airlines upon beginning the Terminal B construction.&nbsp; With passenger enplanements more than 30% below projections in the down economy, costs had be slashed to match that. And if we don't see improvements in passenger traffic, there will be more painful cuts in 2011.&nbsp; There's some hope with the economy turning around in some sectors.<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Restoring transoceanic airline routes</font></b><br /><br />One thing that would help the enplanement totals is restoration of transoceanic airline routes at San Jose. We have two 11,000' runways following construction that completed in 2000.&nbsp; It's enough to handle 767, A330, 777, A340 or 747 transoceanic service.&nbsp; Yet the only international flights now are to Mexico on Mexicana and recently-added service by Volaris.&nbsp; The farthest domestic flights are Hawaiian (767s) to Honolulu, Alaska Air to Maui &amp; Kona, and JetBlue to JFK &amp; Boston.&nbsp; FedEx and UPS also fly heavy freight jets to the east coast.<br /><br />SJC has previously served as a hub airport for Air California, Reno Air and American Airlines.&nbsp; American flew daily non-stops to Tokyo for 15 years until 2008, using a progression of heavy jets from DC-10 to MD-11 to 777-200ER. Briefly in 2001, American also had nonstops from San Jose to Taipei and Paris.&nbsp; The down economy led to the last of their pull-out from the former hub here.&nbsp; Now there are no airline hubs in San Jose.&nbsp; Southwest is our largest carrier.&nbsp; Southwest doesn't use a hub and spoke system.&nbsp; But at 475 flights/week last month it's a similar level of traffic to what some other airlines call hubs.<br /><br />Currently US-based airlines have nearly all their transpacific flights from SFO or LAX.&nbsp; I think for now the challenge ahead of us is to attract a foreign carrier to add service here, with connections to airline alliance partners to help fill the planes.&nbsp; We're within easy 767/A330 range from all of Europe and 777/A340/747 and future 787/A350 range from Australia, Singapore or India.&nbsp; Southwest will be filling the brand-new Terminal B next month.&nbsp; It isn't a member of any overseas airline alliance.&nbsp; So nearly all the airlines that are members of any alliances will all be co-located, which they like for transfers, in Terminal A along with the international gates after Terminal C closes at the end of this month.&nbsp; Once we have some international carriers serving San Jose, we'll be in a better position to attract their US-based alliance partners to upgrade San Jose to at least a focus city.<br /><br />One priority should probably be airlines which will be receiving the new Boeing 787 soon, starting with All-Nippon Airways (ANA) and Japan Airlines (JAL).&nbsp; The plane is the size of a Boeing 767 with the range of a 777ER.&nbsp; With the smaller aircraft, they're not making as big a commitment of seats as with a 777/A340.&nbsp; But we have the capacity for them to make that upgrade to the larger aircraft as demand develops. And they're planning those new routes right now.<br /><br />We do have things going for us.&nbsp; Silicon Valley with its 2.4 million population and many high tech companies is recognized worldwide as a huge economic engine. San Jose is 1 million of that.&nbsp; So this gap in transoceanic service will certainly be filled sooner or later. Though I can only speak for myself, I know we prefer sooner.&nbsp; Compare the population with "that smaller city to the north" (as one of our local radio stations refers to San Francisco) which is 850K population. And with the protection of the 4000' Santa Cruz Mountains, we have a more inland climate not nearly as likely to get coastal low clouds as San Francisco. <br /><br />When American had their nonstops to Tokyo, they marketed us as the "San
Jose/Silicon Valley International Airport". It gets the point across. So it's still a good nickname for the airport.<br /><br />More issues coming up...&nbsp; General Aviation and ground transportation.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>My response on California AB48 regulation of flight schools</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/06/my-response-on-california-ab48.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.15</id>

    <published>2010-06-07T05:08:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-07T05:16:00Z</updated>

    <summary>Word has been increasingly getting around among pilots recently about a nasty surprise in California state regulations. Apparently this was a result of the bankruptcy of Silver State Helicopters, which had required students to pay 100% up-front and then took...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[Word has been increasingly getting around among pilots recently about a
nasty surprise in California state regulations.
Apparently this was a result of the bankruptcy of Silver State Helicopters,
which had required students to pay 100% up-front and then took the money
and ran.  The correct response to that should be to treat it as a case
of fraud, which it was.  (And probably advise people some common sense -
like don't take the risk of getting a loan to pay 100% up front for services
not yet rendered.)
Without consulting any aviation industry people, the legislature quietly
removed an exemption for flight schools and flight instructors from
private postsecondary school regulations.
<i>We all found out about it months after it was signed into law.</i> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>
The fees are $5000 up-front just to register, $3500 recurring renewal fees
and a percentage tax on total school revenues.
</p><p>
In effect, this would put fees that are usually charged to private
universities on small flight school businesses, flying clubs and even
out of pocket for individual flight instructors.  The reality of it is
that most of us can't even remotely afford it.  If this goes through,
we'd just have to give up on doing flight instruction in California.
Game over.
</p><p>
Flight instructors may have to move to another state if they choose
to pursue their dream of flying.
It shouldn't be that way.  But government regulation can be cruel.
</p><p>
Here's some background information.
</p><ul><li><a href="http://calpilots.info/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1858:alert-call-to-action-on-ab-48&amp;catid=44:aviation-interest&amp;Itemid=77">"Call to Action! AB-48"</a>, California Pilots Association
</li><li><a href="http://www.safepilots.org/2010/06/06/safe-opposes-california-bill-to-regulate-fbos-instructors/">"SAFE Opposes California Bill to Regulate FBOs &amp; Instructors"</a>, Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE)
</li><li><a href="http://www.maxtrescott.com/max_trescott_on_general_a/2010/06/california-pilot-alert-new-regulations-to-raise-cost-of-flight-instructionwrite-your-representatives.html">California Pilot Alert: New Regulations To Raise Cost of Flight Instruction--Write Your Representatives Today!</a>, Max Trescott, Certified Flight Instructor
(named <i>National Flight Instructor of the Year</i> in 2008 by the FAA)
</li><li><a href="http://eaa.org/news/2010/2010-06-03_instructors.asp">California Bill to Make Independent Instructors Follow Part 141 Rules</a>, Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA)
</li><li><a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_48_bill_20091011_chaptered.html">full text of Assembly Bill 48 (AB48) as signed</a>
</li></ul>
<p>
I had to do quite a bit of reading to make sure I got my facts straight.
This is the response I sent.
The state wants responses by June 7 (that's "tomorrow" as I'm writing this)
but send yours anyway (to <a href="mailto:Joanne_Wenzel@dca.ca.gov">Bureau for Private Post Secondary Education (BPPSE), c/o Joanne Wenzel</a>) even if you read this after the deadline.
There is also hearing in Sacramento at 10AM on June 7, which I plan to attend.

</p><blockquote><tt>
From: Ian Kluft
<br />
To: Bureau for Private Post Secondary Education (BPPSE), c/o Joanne Wenzel
<br />
Date: June 6, 2010
<br />
Subject: Opposition to new BPPSE regulation of flight schools</tt><br /><br /><p>
<tt>I am writing in opposition of the new BPPSE regulations on flight schools and
Certified Flight Instructors (CFIs) in California by AB 48.  It has recently
come to the attention of pilots including myself that the removal of the
exemption will impose a $5000 registration fee, recurring $3500 renewal fees
and other taxes for flight schools and individual CFIs. These are prohibitive.
</tt></p><p>
<tt>I heard this was because of the bankruptcy of Silver State Helicopters.  If
any laws needed to be changed, they should deal with the fraud which was the
problem there.  Crushing law-abiding citizens and businesses won't help.
</tt></p><p>
<tt>This will affect more than just new student pilots.  Every pilot is required
by the Federal Aviation Regulations in CFR14 Part 61.56 to have a Flight
Review with a CFI every 2 years.  You will curtail the supply of practicing
CFIs.  It will strangle General Aviation in the state by making it difficult
for many existing pilots to get a Flight Review to keep their license current.
</tt></p><p>
<tt>Most flight school companies rarely or barely make a profit.  And individual
CFIs usually instruct on the side from a day job by which they actually make
their living.  If the exemption is not restored, this will shut down all
independent CFIs, most flying clubs and many flight schools.  You will destroy
the options by which middle class people can afford to learn to fly.  Fuel,
insurance and the economy have already made that difficult enough.  Even if
you don't share the dream of flying or becoming a pilot yourself, undoubtedly
you know someone who does.  We're everywhere in every community up and down
the state.  And as Americans, we all have the right to pursue our dreams.
</tt></p><p>
<tt>The effect on me as an individual CFI would be devastating.  I personally
resent that you have created a situation which could force me to move out of
California in order to continue to pursue my dreams. I was born in California
and have always resided here.  Please restore the exemption for flight schools.
</tt></p><p>
<tt>Respectfully submitted,
</tt></p><p>
<tt>Ian Kluft
<br />
Certified Flight Instructor (CFI)
<br />
San Jose, California
</tt></p></blockquote>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Reminder: paper pilot certificates no longer valid after March 31</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/03/reminder-paper-pilot-certifica.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.14</id>

    <published>2010-03-02T23:03:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-03-03T01:13:38Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA["Paper or plastic?"&nbsp; That question we hear at the grocery store could also have applied to pilot licenses.&nbsp; But not any more.If you still have an old paper pilot certificate, it's time to upgrade it to a plastic (credit card...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="certificates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="regulation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/US_pilots_certificate_front.jpg"><img alt="US_pilots_certificate_front.jpg" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/03/US_pilots_certificate_front-thumb-350x226-21.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="226" width="350" /></a></span>"Paper or plastic?"&nbsp; That question we hear at the grocery store could also have applied to pilot licenses.&nbsp; But not any more.<br /><br />If you still have an old paper pilot certificate, it's time to
upgrade it to a plastic (credit card like) certificate.&nbsp; Your license
doesn't expire.&nbsp; But it's like the requirement for a flight review or a
medical certificate in order to continue to use those privileges. If you've got a
paper certificate, you won't be allowed to use your privileges after
March 31, 2010 until you replace it with a plastic certificate.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/03/US_pilots_certificate_back-23.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/03/US_pilots_certificate_back-23.html','popup','width=640,height=419,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/03/US_pilots_certificate_back-thumb-350x229-23.jpg" alt="US_pilots_certificate_back.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="229" width="350" /></a></span> <div>The FAA's web site has a <a href="http://www.faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/expiring_paper_certificates/">page about replacing an old paper pilot certificate with a new plastic one</a>.&nbsp; If your pilot certificate is still based on your SSN, which is likely if you still have a paper certificate, then it's a free upgrade.&nbsp; But even if not, the replacement fee is only $2.&nbsp; So do it.<br /></div><div><br />I recommend using the online form to request the plastic certificate.&nbsp; You'll have to register with the FAA's web site.&nbsp; Then they can have the new plastic certificate sent to you in a matter of days.<br /><br />If you really prefer using paper and postal mail, that option is still available for requesting the replacement certificate.&nbsp; But it can take the usual 4-6 weeks that process has always taken.<br /><br />Whichever way you choose, do it.&nbsp; Keep flying!<br /></div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New instrument procedures effective today (2/11)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2010/02/new-instrument-procedures-effe.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2010:/blog//1.13</id>

    <published>2010-02-11T16:05:50Z</published>
    <updated>2010-02-12T01:48:50Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Instrument rated pilots... It's a new 56-day cycle today on FAA published instrument procedures.&nbsp; I have the list of new procedures here at PilotQuest.Com being automatically updated weekly for California and the entire US.In California, the big winner today is...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="GPS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="IFR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="navigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/02/kaun-rnav-rwy-07-small-18.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/02/kaun-rnav-rwy-07-small-18.html','popup','width=500,height=730,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2010/02/kaun-rnav-rwy-07-small-thumb-200x292-18.png" alt="kaun-rnav-rwy-07-small.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="292" width="200" /></a></span>Instrument rated pilots... It's a new 56-day cycle today on FAA published instrument procedures.&nbsp; I have the list of new procedures here at PilotQuest.Com being automatically updated weekly for <a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/iap/current/ca.html">California</a> and <a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/iap/current/">the entire US</a>.<br /><br />In California, the big winner today is Auburn Municipal Airport, with a brand new RNAV GPS approach with WAAS and LPV.&nbsp; The old "
			GPS RWY 07" has been superseded by "<a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/1002/09143R7.PDF">RNAV (GPS) RWY 07</a>" (link to PDF of procedure). ]]>
        <![CDATA[<b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Details about Auburn's new LPV approach</font></b><br />For those pilots who aren't yet instrument rated but want to be (or people who want to become pilots), that's a GPS-based instrument approach with higher
precision because it uses WAAS (the Wide Area Augmentaton System).&nbsp; LPV
means "localizer precision with vertical guidance", which means the
approach has a glideslope indication like an ILS.&nbsp; In fact, places with
no nearby obstacles can have 200' AGL minimums on LPV approaches just like an ILS.&nbsp; Of course, with the terrain around Auburn, the minimums had to be higher.&nbsp; Under ideal circumstances, it's 315' AGL.&nbsp; That's better than the 450' minimums there were before on the GPS approach there.<br /><br />But there's always a catch.&nbsp; If GPS reception isn't good, your IFR GPS receiver won't authorize LPV minimums for that approach, falling back to LNAV/VNAV (lower precision but still with vertical guidance) or even just LNAV (no vertical guidance).&nbsp; And if you're using the altimeter setting from Lincoln instead of Auburn, then the minimums go even higher.&nbsp; It's all on the published procedure.&nbsp; Hopefully the cloud ceiling will be above your minimums when you fly the approach.&nbsp; But never hesitate to fly the missed approach procedure upon reaching the minimum if you can't see the runway environment.&nbsp; Descending below the decision altitude (DA) without seeing the runway is dangerous, and statistically the cause of many IFR flying accidents.<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Lancaster's new GPS approach</font></b><br />Lancaster is apparently the runner-up in the upgraded instrument approach prizes today in California.&nbsp; Lancaster's Fox Field (KWJF) already had an LPV approach for Runway 6.&nbsp; But it got a new LNAV approach for Runway 24 today.<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">New CTAF at Tracy</font></b><br />This isn't on the schedule of instrument procedure changes.&nbsp; But it was pointed out via Twitter by <a href="http://twitter.com/Captain_Ron">@Captain_Ron</a> (thanks!) that there's a new CTAF (common traffic advisory frequency) at Tracy Municipal Airport (KTCY) today.&nbsp; I looked it up - it changed to 123.07. Since Tracy is a non-towered airport, the CTAF is the frequency that pilots use to coordinate runway and traffic pattern usage with each other.<br /><br /><b><font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Other upcoming approaches in California</font></b><br />The next 56-day publishing cycle will be on April 8. In California, Hawthorne, Shafter&nbsp; and San Diego will get new LPV approaches.<br /><br />A notable missing item from that day is my home airport, San Jose's Reid-Hillview Airport.&nbsp; Originally RHV was supposed to get 2 new LPV approaches (one each for Runways 31R and 13L) today.&nbsp; Then last Summer it was postponed to April 8.&nbsp; Then in December I noticed it was pushed back again, now to June 3.&nbsp; Sigh.&nbsp; We could really use those LPV approaches because the current LNAV/VNAV approach has 1440' AGL minimums that are usually higher than the clouds when we have weather here. Oh well... we wait.<br /><br />Under the current schedule, the July 29 update will have new LPV approaches for Alturas, Hanford and Lincoln.&nbsp; Paso Robles will get an LPV approach on September 23. And some new LPV approaches are planned in 2011 for Crescent City and Oroville.<br /><br />But you never know if there will be more changes in the schedule.&nbsp; Sometimes it may take longer than expected to develop a procedure. But other times airlines put pressure on the FAA to bump up the schedule on their preferred new approaches. <br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>List of planned instrument approaches now updated weekly</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/10/list-of-planned-instrument-app.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.12</id>

    <published>2009-10-05T05:31:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-10-05T06:29:57Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The response to the list of "New instrument approaches planned for California" last month was encouraging. It looks like pilots found it as useful as I hoped it would be.&nbsp; I made some updates to the software to update the...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="IFR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="navigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[The response to the list of "New instrument approaches planned for California" last month was encouraging. It looks like pilots found it as useful as I hoped it would be.&nbsp; I made some updates to the software to <a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/iap/current/">update the list on a weekly basis</a>.&nbsp; And now it's expanded from a statewide list to nationwide.<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[This is of interest to pilots who are instrument rated, training for their instrument rating, or planning to get that training.&nbsp; It tells what updates and additions that the FAA is planning for instrument flight procedures at various airports where we may want or need to fly to.<br /><br />The big point of interest recently has been when there are new approaches which can be flown by Global Positioning System (GPS).&nbsp; And even more recently, the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) has been delivering on the technology's promise to let small aircraft have approach precision nearly or sometimes just as good at smaller airports as at large airports.&nbsp; It's opening up a lot more airports when there's weather.<br /><br />Basically, for small airports, any GPS approach is usually good.&nbsp; But if you get an LPV (localilzer precision with vertical guidance) approach, that's the big score for a General Aviation airport. Pilots everywhere want to know, "when does my airport get one?"&nbsp; If it's in their schedule, then the answer is here.<br /><br />Of course, the usual advice - don't use a GPS's precision as an excuse to fly into conditions that you wouldn't otherwise.&nbsp; But with appropriate practice, these technologies are worth all the excitement.<br /><br />These lists are all public information.&nbsp; But the FAA doesn't make it easy to
get.&nbsp; And it isn't easy to process all that information once you get it.&nbsp; No problem - now I've done all that for
you.&nbsp; So enjoy it.]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New instrument approaches planned for California</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/09/new-instrument-approaches-plan.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.11</id>

    <published>2009-09-02T02:03:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-09-02T03:16:34Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Following a related discussion on the Silicon Valley General Aviation mail list, I made a list of the FAA's plans for upcoming new instrument approaches in California.&nbsp; This list is from the FAA's National Aeronautical Charting Office (NACO).&nbsp; It's info...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="GPS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="IFR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="navigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[Following a related discussion on the Silicon Valley General Aviation mail list, I made a <a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/iap/ca-20090901.html">list of the FAA's plans for upcoming new instrument approaches</a> in California.&nbsp; This list is from the FAA's National Aeronautical Charting Office (NACO).&nbsp; It's info anyone can get - but hopefully the formatting makes it more easily accessible.<br /><br />This should mainly be of interest to instrument-rated pilots who fly in California, and pilots who are or plan to get training for their instrument rating in California.<br /><br />Now that I have software to generate this list from their plans, I'll update it regularly.<br />
<br />
Here are some highlights from their current plans...<br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[<br />
<ul><li>Napa (KAPC), Marysville (KMYV), Redding (KRDD) and Salinas (KSNS) just got their GPS approaches upgraded to LPV on Aug 27.</li><li>Mojave (KMHV) will get new GPS (non-WAAS) approaches on Sept 24</li><li>Barstow-Daggett (KDAG) will get a GPS approach upgraded to LPV on Oct 22.</li><li>Tracy (KTCY) will get a new GPS (non-WAAS) approach on Oct 22.</li><li>Los Banos (KLSN) and Livermore (KLVK) will get new GPS/LPV approaches on Dec 17.</li><li>Auburn will get a new GPS/LPV approach on Feb 11, 2010.</li><li>Reid-Hillview (KRHV), my home airport, will get two new LPV approaches on April 8, 2010.</li><li>Watsonville (KWVI) will get a new GPS (non-WAAS) approach on June 3, 2010.</li></ul>
Of course, these plans can change.&nbsp; Some of them already have.&nbsp; About 6
weeks ago when I checked the list, RHV's new approaches were scheduled
for February 11, and have since been delayed to April 8.<br /><br />For some airports, an LPV (Localizer Performance with Vertical guidance) approach is almost like getting an Instrument Landing System (ILS).&nbsp; If there aren't obstructions around the airport, an LPV can have minimums as low as 200' AGL just like an ILS.&nbsp; In most cases, the minimums will still be higher.<br /><br />But if you consider some airports like Reid-Hillview in San Jose, our current non-WAAS GPS approach has minimums at 1440' or higher, which is usually well in the clouds when we have weather.&nbsp; The LPV approaches certainly will be higher than 200' minimums due to terrain, obstructions, and a badly-placed shopping mall. But as long as the minimums are below about 1000' then it should be a lot more useful.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Comical waypoint names</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/07/comical-waypoint-names.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.10</id>

    <published>2009-07-07T21:44:44Z</published>
    <updated>2009-07-07T21:47:31Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[It's always nice when there's a chance to throw some fun into the learning process.&nbsp; Anyone who looks at aviation maps, whether they're a pilot or some day want to be, sees those inexplicably-named 5-letter names for waypoints (also called...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="humor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="navigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[It's always nice when there's a chance to throw some fun into the learning process.&nbsp; Anyone who looks at aviation maps, whether they're a pilot or some day want to be, sees those inexplicably-named 5-letter names for waypoints (also called intersections and fixes) on the map.&nbsp; Sometimes they may actually make some sense.&nbsp; Near here, GILRO intersection located near the city of Gilroy is the entry point for instrument approaches to San Jose International and Reid-Hillview Airports.&nbsp; And SUNOL intersection, located near the town of, you guessed it, Sunol is commonly used for traffic going to San Francisco and Oakland International Airports.&nbsp; So if you're not on an instrument flight plan, it's good to know so you can steer clear of these chokepoints.<br /><br />More often than not, the names make little sense.&nbsp; They are, after all, just intended as a 5-letter index into a navigation database.&nbsp; For example, at Reid-Hillview Airport in San Jose, we have boring and meaningless names on the RNAV/GPS Runway 31R approach - after passing the initial approach fix at GILRO, it goes to ECYON, OZNUM and JOPAN.&nbsp; They really are just intended to enter into a flight computer.&nbsp; And you don't even enter them since you'd just select the whole approach procedure.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2009/07/07/iap-psm-rnav16-looneytunes.png"><img alt="iap-psm-rnav16-looneytunes.png" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2009/07/iap-psm-rnav16-looneytunes-thumb-350x332-11.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="332" width="350" /></a></span>But fortunately there are some gems of humor out there too.&nbsp; Yesterday I mentioned a few on Twitter and Facebook, and asked who knows of more of them.&nbsp; I started by mentioning one of the most famous in the aviation community, the "Looney Tunes Approach" at Portsmouth NH (KPSM), which has a series of waypoints ITAWT, ITAWA, PUDYE, TTATT and IDEED.&nbsp; (If you aren't seeing that as a quote of the cartoon character Tweety Bird, read it again.)&nbsp; Someone at the FAA had fun with that.&nbsp; And now all of us can too.&nbsp; The instrument approach procedure (or "approach plate") for that one is the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00678R16.PDF">Portsmouth RNAV/GPS Runway 16 approach</a>.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[(There's something odd about <a href="http://twitter.com/ikluft/status/2499013797">tweeting on Twitter a quote from Tweety Bird</a>.)<br /><br />But that's just the beginning of it.&nbsp; Another one in New Hampshire is at the Lebanon (KLEB) airport's <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00859IL18.PDF">ILS Runway 18 approach</a> where an aircraft will sequence through the waypoints HAMMM BURGR and FRYYS.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/iap-mci-rnav1r-ribs.png"><img alt="iap-mci-rnav1r-ribs.png" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2009/07/iap-mci-rnav1r-ribs-thumb-300x391-13.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="391" width="300" /></a></span>More promotion of local cuisine can be found at Kansas City MO (MCI) on the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00780IL1R.PDF">ILS Runway 1R approach</a> where the waypoints along the ILS final approach course are SPICY, BARBQ, TERKY, SMOKE and RIBBS.<br /><br />There's another kind of instrument procedure chart called a standard arrival or STAR.&nbsp; Larger airports and metropolitan areas have these to help sequence instrument arrivals farther out from the destination.&nbsp; For the Houston Hobby Airport (KHOU) and some other airports in the area, the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00198TEXNN.PDF">TEXNN FOUR standard arrival procedure</a> starts at the Cowboy VOR (CVE) near Dallas and then continues playing on the sports theme from there through these waypoints: ELLVR (player name), GOALL, PPUNT, DRPPD, FTBAL, CARRR (player name), TEXNN, COACH, QTRBK, TAKKL, RECVR, FMBLE and TCHDN which positions you for several approaches to Houston.<br /><br />The sports theme seems to be popular with the FAA.&nbsp; At Portland, Oregon (KPDX) there are two waypoints on the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00330IL10L.PDF">ILS Runway 10L approach</a> called TRAYL and BLAZR after the local NBA team.<br /><br />Some online forums pointed out that Green Bay WI (KGRB) has a bunch of sports players' names among local waypoints.&nbsp; Although the Final Approach Fixes (FAFs) called FRZZN and TNDRA on the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00873R36.PDF">RNAV/GPS Runway 36</a> and <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00873R6.PDF">RNAV/GPS Runway 6</a> approaches sound more like references to the local climate than sports.<br /><br />At first I was surprised to see the FAA delving into politics.&nbsp; Hans Cathcart pointed out that DC area pilots are aware of an intersection called DUBYA, located in the Special Flight Rules Area that civilians usually can't fly into.&nbsp; One would think that has to go away soon after the change of administration there.&nbsp; But with a closer look, that waypoint is used as part of another theme.&nbsp; At Andrews AFB (KADW), the home of Air Force One, the waypoints for the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00561R19R.PDF">RNAV/GPS Runway 19R approach</a> (the right runway) are named for Republican presidents (the right-leaning party)... DUBYA, BUUSH, FORRD and RREGN.&nbsp; The left runway has an ILS approach with much older names.&nbsp; Already having a precision approach on the left runway, it's clear why there was a priority to add a GPS approach for the right runway.&nbsp; But when the left runway (19L) gets its new GPS approach, it's a fairly easy guess it'll get waypoints named for Democratic presidents (the left-leaning party).&nbsp; I noticed there is not yet an OBAMA waypoint in the system - so that's undoubtedly where it will go.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2009/07/07/iap-edw-rnav4r-flyte.png"><img alt="iap-edw-rnav4r-flyte.png" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2009/07/iap-edw-rnav4r-flyte-thumb-350x253-15.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="253" width="350" /></a></span>Another place where an Air Force Base has established a theme for its waypoints is Edwards AFB, the world-famous home of the Air Force Test Pilot School and NASA Dryden Flight Research Center.&nbsp; On the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00500R4R.PDF">RNAV/GPS Runway 4R approach</a>, there are waypoints TESST, FLYTE, PNCHO, BARNZ (named for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Barnes">Pancho Barnes</a>), the final approach fix at YAYGR (named for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Yeager">Chuck Yeager</a>) and on the missed approach apparently you go into the future of test flight to KIIRK (presumably from Star Trek).&nbsp; The same runway in the other direction, the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00500R22L.PDF">RNAV/GPS Runway 22L approach</a> has interesting waypoints, XPLAN, STLTH, SONIQ and BOOOM.&nbsp; Of course, being a military base, these are approaches that we civilian pilots don't get to fly.&nbsp; Although I have twice gotten clearances to fly through Restricted Area R-2505 over Edwards AFB enroute to somewhere else.&nbsp; And some of the waypoints like TESST, FLYTE, PNCHO and BARNZ are outside R-2505 in airspace we civilians do use to go around it.<br /><br />One of my local favorites that I've flown is SNUPY intersection next to the Charles Schultz Sonoma County Airport (KSTS) in Santa Rosa.&nbsp; On an instrument departure from there you'll probably be assigned the <a href="http://naco.faa.gov/d-tpp/0907/00696SANTAROSA.PDF">Santa Rosa Six departure procedure</a> via SNUPY.<br /><br />Want to find more of these?&nbsp; Just about everyone who talks about it has to mention the Looney Tunes Approach at Portsmouth.&nbsp; So you can just <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22ITAWT+ITAWA+PUDYE+TTATT%22">Google for "ITAWT ITAWA PUDYE TTATT"</a> and there's plenty more reading.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Flying GPS-direct is simple - but still no substitute for thinking</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/06/flying-gps-direct-is-simple--.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.9</id>

    <published>2009-06-27T16:02:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-27T19:35:47Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The Summer flying season is here again.&nbsp; As more light aircraft are getting increasingly sophisticated panel-mounted GPS systems, pilots are freer to navigate away from airways and radio navigational aids.&nbsp; One of the most obvious things to try is to...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="GPS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="navigation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="safety" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[The Summer flying season is here again.&nbsp; As more light aircraft are getting increasingly sophisticated panel-mounted GPS systems, pilots are freer to navigate away from airways and radio navigational aids.&nbsp; One of the most obvious things to try is to just fly a straight line to the destination.&nbsp; It's called "GPS direct".&nbsp; But I'll show some local examples from here in Northern California why that isn't always a good idea.&nbsp; A GPS is still an enormously useful navigation tool.&nbsp; But it requires delving deeper into how that GPS gadget works to get the best use of it. ]]>
        <![CDATA[Now, what I'm telling here isn't anything new.&nbsp; <a href="http://aopa.org/">AOPA</a> has an excellent safety paper <a href="http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/sa01.pdf">"GPS from the Ground Up"</a> which goes into a lot more detail on issues of climbing the learning curve of an aviation GPS.&nbsp; But I'll present an example for our local area in Silicon Valley and Central California.<br /><br />Let's consider a flight from Reid-Hillview Airport (KRHV) to Modesto (KMOD).&nbsp; It's about 45nm - so it doesn't even count for a cross-country flight.&nbsp; It may be tempting to just enter the destination and fly direct.&nbsp; After all, no one reads the manuals before trying out their consumer devices at home either, right?<br /><br />Wrong.&nbsp; Since you're a pilot, you have a lot more responsibility than Joe Random Consumer.&nbsp; And the GPS in your plane, or the rental plane that you reserved, is a world apart from a consumer gadget.&nbsp; These things aren't dumbed-down to 7th grade level.&nbsp; It really does help to read the manual, and maybe even pick up an aftermarket book on the device.<br /><br />For Garmin GNS430/430W/530/530W and G1000, I like Max Trescott's books and CD courses. His CD courses even work on Linux.&nbsp; Sporty's, King Schools and others have DVDs and computer courses too.&nbsp; All the GPS manufacturers have software simulators.&nbsp; There are a lot of products because there's a lot of demand from pilots to learn this.<br /><br />Find a way to strike a balance between your enthusiasm for the technology and taking it seriously.&nbsp; Don't let it discourage you - but don't skip the study either.&nbsp; A little time spent reading up before the flight will actually go a long way toward getting useful practice with the box and getting it to do what you want.&nbsp; Keep that enthusiasm - but prepare so you can avoid frustration.&nbsp; And you know whether you're a self-starter or not on things like this - it may be a good idea to ask a CFI for help getting started on the GPS in your plane.<br /><br />So let's get back to that flight to Modesto.&nbsp; As we plan the flight, we can start with a plot of the direct route and see what it gets us.&nbsp; And this route has a problem...<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2009/06/27/krhv-kmod-gps-direct-mtns.png"><img alt="krhv-kmod-gps-direct-mtns.png" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/assets_c/2009/06/krhv-kmod-gps-direct-mtns-thumb-300x133-8.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="133" width="300" /></a></span><div>The problem is that the route would take us over some rough terrain in the Diablo Range Mountains.&nbsp; While technically there's no reason we can't do that, the route leaves few or no options in case of a forced landing.&nbsp; And even after a skillful landing, there's no cell phone coverage down in those canyons to get help or even a ride.&nbsp; So maybe we want to pick a route more around the periphery of those mountains.<br /><br />But we're not throwing the GPS out.&nbsp; In fact, it still shines brightly for this trip.&nbsp; So now we need to look in the GPS manual or book, and find out how to enter a flight route into it.&nbsp; Although every GPS manufacturer has a different style, the route will always be a series of waypoints.<br /><br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="vfr-waypoints-symbols.png" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/vfr-waypoints-symbols.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="120" width="118" /></span>So we need to pick a route.&nbsp; A good route should be easy to verify visually in VFR flight.&nbsp; Instead of just VOR and NDB stations, we can use any intersection or visual waypoint on the map.&nbsp; I like to use the web site <a href="http://skyvector.com/">skyvector.com</a> for this.&nbsp; It lets me try out and plot a route.&nbsp; If I don't like it, I can add or remove waypoints and plot a new route.&nbsp; If we enter "KRHV KMOD", we can see those nasty mountains in our way.&nbsp; As we look for a route around them, click on the SFO Terminal chart for some more details.&nbsp; There are visual waypoints at Calaveras Reservoir (VPCAL) and Del Valle Dam (VPDAM).&nbsp; You can recognize them by the magenta flags and a 5-letter waypoint name starting with "VP".&nbsp; VFR waypoints also use the diamond waypoint symbol which originated on IFR charts.<br /><br />So now let's try the route "KRHV VPCAL VPDAM KMOD" on skyvector.com.&nbsp; That looks much better.&nbsp; You wouldn't want to stray any closer to the Restricted Area R-2531 than this.&nbsp; But it has a ceiling of 4000' MSL.&nbsp; If in doubt, fly above it.&nbsp; You should fly at least that high anyway because there's a 2986' peak south of your route in that area.&nbsp; 5500' is a good VFR cruising altitude for the eastbound part of the flight - fly at least 4500' while passing the 3000' peak and 4000' Restricted Area R-2531.<br /><br />Remember that you want some safety buffer so that the radar controllers don't think that you busted restricted airspace - they're not looking at your GPS.&nbsp; So use at least a mile off any side and 500' above, preferably more.&nbsp; Any good GPS should also show that airspace to you.<br /><br />Those same waypoints you entered into skyvector can now be entered into your favorite flight planning software or web site to meet the requirement to verify that we know we have enough fuel.&nbsp; You can use the same waypoints to file a VFR flight plan.&nbsp; And the same waypoints can be entered into the route on the GPS.&nbsp; While you're at Reid-Hillview, you don't have to enter KRHV.&nbsp; So enter VPCAL, VPDAM, and KMOD.&nbsp; Activate the first leg.&nbsp; Then after takeoff, the GPS should show you a line on the map.<br /><br />Select the GPS input for your CDI and you can have right or left indications to get you back on the course centerline all the way to Modesto.<br /><br />Can you do that?&nbsp; With practice it'll become easy.&nbsp; Give yourself several flights that you know how to do without the GPS to practice and figure it out.&nbsp; You'll see that it takes some time to learn the menus in each manufacturer's GPS.&nbsp; But once you do, it'll be as fun as you expect it should be.&nbsp; It's just a bigger step than most people think to get to that point.<br /><br />As it turns out, I picked a route that can be flown just about as easily without a GPS.&nbsp; Modesto has a VOR on the field.&nbsp; It's a good idea on initial practice flights with a new GPS to go somewhere that you can fall back on what you already know, just in case.&nbsp; So even if you don't pick this particular route, use that idea.<br /><br />So here's an exercise... Practice this until you can explain to another pilot or student pilot what you're doing.&nbsp; Then you know you've got it.<br /><ul><li>Start from your home airport - so it doesn't have to be KRHV.</li><li>Find another public airport within a short cross-country distance, about 45-80nm, where the direct route would take you over mountains, restricted airspace or something which makes the direct route not a good idea.&nbsp; In the previous example, we had to contend with the Diablo Range Mountains and Restricted Area R-2531.</li><li>Pick additional waypoints which will go around the problem.&nbsp; VFR waypoints are the best choice to start with because you want to see them to know for sure you're in the right place.&nbsp; Later as you get good at it, you can advance to using any waypoints in the system that suit your navigation, or even latitude and longitude.&nbsp; But for starters, keep it simple.<br /></li></ul><br />For example, if your home airport is Palo Alto (KPAO), then a direct flight to Tracy Municipal Airport (KTCY) would go through Restricted Area R-2531.&nbsp; So we have to go around.<br /><br />That's actually not so tough.&nbsp; It's just a matter of recognizing that you still have to plan your route.<br /><br />Use this technique to plan your next VFR flight.&nbsp; The difference from using radio navaids is that you can fly to any waypoints you want along the way and use them all like navaids.&nbsp; Of course, if there are no problems or obstacles with the direct route, then it's fine to use it.&nbsp; The point here is to check it for problems, and know how to use the GPS to fly a route around it.<br /></div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Explanation for the gap in the blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/06/explanation-for-the-gap-in-the.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.8</id>

    <published>2009-06-12T11:52:19Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-12T12:00:30Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[The blog was off to a good start.&nbsp; And then there was no excuse for the long gap before the previous entry.&nbsp; But here's the explanation... I upgraded the server's operating system and blog software at the same time and...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="site news" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[The blog was off to a good start.&nbsp; And then there was no excuse for the long gap before the previous entry.&nbsp; But here's the explanation... I upgraded the server's operating system and blog software at the same time and then it wouldn't update.&nbsp; The static pages remained up.&nbsp; I knew I had to be barking up the wrong tree when each time, sometimes months apart, that I tried a new idea about what was getting in the way.&nbsp; I checked logs for various OS and server features.&nbsp; I finally found it was the upgrade of the blog software itself - they completely re-did their template names and just broke the updates.<br /><br />Anyway, it works again.&nbsp; So I intend to re-establish a routine of providing regular content here. Hopefully you'll find it interesting and informative.<br /> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Marking 20 years as a pilot</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2009/06/marking-20-years-as-a-pilot.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2009:/blog//1.7</id>

    <published>2009-06-11T06:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-06-12T11:43:33Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[It has been 20 years.&nbsp; On June 10, 1989 I got my original Private Pilot license.&nbsp; I was still in grad school at California State University, Chico.&nbsp; I took the check ride with an FAA designated examiner in a Cessna...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="CFI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="student pilot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[It has been 20 years.&nbsp; On June 10, 1989 I got my original Private Pilot license.&nbsp; I was still in grad school at California State University, Chico.&nbsp; I took the check ride with an FAA designated examiner in a Cessna 150 from the Chico Municipal Airport. ]]>
        <![CDATA[As I've marked the occasion with friends, I hear from some who still dream of making that accomplishment for themselves.&nbsp; Don't worry - I understand.&nbsp; I was a "wannabe pilot" for years before I was able to get the training.&nbsp; If you want to do it, you have to make it happen.&nbsp; Be determined.&nbsp; Just don't let it be something you wished forever that you had done.<br /><br />I'm probably telling you something you can already guess when I say it's a lot of work.&nbsp; Even if you save up ahead of time, it's probably going to take at least a few months if you fly several times per week.&nbsp; But it may also not be as tough as you're imagining - it is something most people can do.&nbsp; The learning process is step-by-step so that you really can learn it all one thing at time.<br /><br />Anyway, I hope that mentioning the anniversary of getting my license will help some people to decide to get started themselves.<br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thunderstorms near airports - what&apos;s the problem?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2008/06/thunderstorms-near-airports-wh.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2008:/blog//1.6</id>

    <published>2008-06-29T20:02:38Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-30T05:13:02Z</updated>

    <summary>On June 21, the first day of Summer, we had thunderstorms here in San Jose and elsewhere in Northern California, some with frequent lightning.  We even saw one that had a small funnel cloud. [...] While you wouldn&apos;t hesitate to drive a car under a thunderstorm, flying an light aircraft near one is a different story. [...] So let&apos;s talk about the safety issues behind it.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="weather" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="safety" label="safety" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="thunderstorms" label="thunderstorms" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="weather" label="weather" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a style="" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2008/06/29/rhv-funnel-20080621.jpg"><img alt="rhv-funnel-20080621.jpg" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2008/06/29/rhv-funnel-20080621-thumb-250x340.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="340" width="250" /></a></span>It's officially Summer in the northern hemisphere.&nbsp; On June 21, the first day of Summer, we had thunderstorms here in San Jose and elsewhere in Northern California, some with frequent lightning.&nbsp; We even saw one that had a small funnel cloud.&nbsp; While we usually have some minor thunderstorms in the Bay Area at times from Spring to Fall, these conditions were things we see maybe once every 5-10 years.&nbsp; So that's rare here.<br /><br />Some of us pilots stayed on the ground to watch the storm from safety.&nbsp; We also noticed that some were flying around the pattern while thunderstorms with active lightning were within 5 miles of the field.&nbsp; Here in California, we don't often get practice exercising judgment about thunderstorms.&nbsp; But it really is important.&nbsp; While you wouldn't hesitate to drive a car under a thunderstorm, flying a light aircraft near one is a different story.&nbsp; It's a case where we have to know the difference and exercise appropriate judgment.&nbsp; So let's talk about the safety issues behind it.<br />]]>
        <![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/">FAA's Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM)</a> has something to say
about flight safety near thunderstorms in <a href="http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/Chap7/aim0701.html#rkIfaJACK">sections 7-1-28 and 7-1-29</a>.&nbsp;
In general, you want to stay 10 miles away from any thunderstorm and 20
miles away from severe thunderstorms.&nbsp; It can be hard to tell if it's
severe, or if it's going to grow into a severe storm before you reach
it.&nbsp; So err on the side of caution.<br /><br />Also, don't fly under the
"anvil" (wispy cirrus clouds at the top) of a thunderstorm.&nbsp; The cirrus
clouds at the top are always made of ice.&nbsp; You know that storm is
moving ice up there.&nbsp; But you don't know if ice is also falling in the
form of hail.&nbsp; Under the anvil, there is a risk of hail even outside
the visible clouds.<br /><br />If a thunderstorm is within 10 miles of an
airport, these warnings still apply.&nbsp; Every thunderstorm has updrafts
and downdrafts, by definition.&nbsp; When the downdrafts hit the ground, the
wind spreads out in all directions.&nbsp; Thunderstorms are surrounded by
"gust fronts" at the edge of their winds' influence.&nbsp; At an airport,
the arrival of a gust front will come as a sudden change in wind
direction as the outflow from the storm overruns the airport.&nbsp; That
will make things at least difficult if not dangerous if you're in the
pattern or on the runway when it arrives.<br /><br />Once inside the gust
front, the local winds at the airport are under the influence of the
chaotic pattern of updrafts and downdrafts of the storm.&nbsp; In a light
aircraft, the updrafts can suck you up into the storm clouds and the
downdrafts can cause uncontrolled loss of altitude, possibly to the
ground.<br /><br />Even airliners have had accidents in thunderstorms.&nbsp;
Though since the late 80's, airliners have weather radar and large
airports have wind shear detection which together have very effectively
mitigated the problem.&nbsp; But we don't have those tools in most small
planes or at most small airports.&nbsp; So the prudent advice is to stay out
of and away from thunderstorms.<br /><br />Oh, and lightning too.&nbsp; That's
probably the most obvious hazard because it's the most dramatic thing
we can see in a thunderstorm.&nbsp; Lightning is a hazard anywhere under the
storm's anvil.&nbsp; For all the other reasons mentioned above, you would
already want to stay away from there.&nbsp; So just add it to the list.<br /><br />Fortunately,
thunderstorms are usually short-term events.&nbsp; A single thunderstorm
cell can grow to maturity and die out well inside of an hour.&nbsp; The
atmospheric conditions which started it will likely still be present to
make more in the area.&nbsp; It isn't difficult to be alert and be safe.&nbsp;
But you have to actually make the decision to do so.<br /><br />Other useful online resources:<br /><ul><li><a href="http://www.aopa.org/asf/thunderstorm.html">AOPA Air Safety Foundation - Thunderstorm awareness resources</a><br />(includes online training course good toward the FAA Wings program and AOPA/AIG insurance accident forgiveness)</li><li><a href="http://www.faasafety.gov/gslac/ALC/libview_normal.aspx?id=9065">FAA Safety Team - Thunderstorm avoidance tips</a><br /></li><li><a href="http://www.faa.gov/ats/afss/newyork/tstorms.htm">FAA - "Thunderstorms - Don't Flirt 'em, Skirt 'em"</a><br /></li></ul><br />Note about the photo... Another flight instructor and I were waiting out the weather.&nbsp; He went outside to take another look at the storm and then yelled, "Ian! Come quick! Bring your camera!"&nbsp; I got outside and confirmed what he was looking at was a funnel cloud.&nbsp; I got a few pictures before it dissipated.<br /><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2008/06/29/rhv-funnel-20080621.jpg"><img alt="rhv-funnel-20080621.jpg" src="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/2008/06/29/rhv-funnel-20080621-thumb-250x340.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="340" width="250" /></a></span>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>How much does it cost to learn to fly?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/2008/06/how-much-does-it-cost-to-learn.html" />
    <id>tag:www.pilotquest.com,2008:/blog//1.5</id>

    <published>2008-06-18T18:51:13Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-18T18:53:47Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I added an article "How much does it cost to learn to fly?"&nbsp; It's the first question from every prospective student pilot....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Kluft</name>
        <uri>http://ian.kluft.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="student pilot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cost" label="cost" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="privatepilot" label="private pilot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="studentpilot" label="student pilot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pilotquest.com/b/">
        <![CDATA[I added an article "<a href="http://www.pilotquest.com/blog/questions/cost-to-learn-to-fly.html">How much does it cost to learn to fly?</a>"&nbsp; It's the first question from every prospective student pilot. ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

